mirror of
https://github.com/SamyRai/turash.git
synced 2025-12-26 23:01:33 +00:00
000eab4740
Repository Structure:
- Move files from cluttered root directory into organized structure
- Create archive/ for archived data and scraper results
- Create bugulma/ for the complete application (frontend + backend)
- Create data/ for sample datasets and reference materials
- Create docs/ for comprehensive documentation structure
- Create scripts/ for utility scripts and API tools
Backend Implementation:
- Implement 3 missing backend endpoints identified in gap analysis:
* GET /api/v1/organizations/{id}/matching/direct - Direct symbiosis matches
* GET /api/v1/users/me/organizations - User organizations
* POST /api/v1/proposals/{id}/status - Update proposal status
- Add complete proposal domain model, repository, and service layers
- Create database migration for proposals table
- Fix CLI server command registration issue
API Documentation:
- Add comprehensive proposals.md API documentation
- Update README.md with Users and Proposals API sections
- Document all request/response formats, error codes, and business rules
Code Quality:
- Follow existing Go backend architecture patterns
- Add proper error handling and validation
- Match frontend expected response schemas
- Maintain clean separation of concerns (handler -> service -> repository)
48 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
48 lines
3.6 KiB
Markdown
## 17. Key Challenges & Solutions
|
|
|
|
Based on systematic analysis of existing industrial symbiosis platforms, the following challenges must be addressed:
|
|
|
|
### Data Availability & Quality Issues
|
|
- **Challenge**: Lack of standardized, comprehensive data on waste generation and resource availability
|
|
- **Solution**: IoT sensors for real-time monitoring, automated data collection from ERP/SCADA systems, standardized taxonomy (EWC/NACE), and NLP-based text mining for unstructured data sources
|
|
- **Tactical**: Allow rough estimates (±50%), estimated (±20%), measured (±5%) precision levels; weight measured data higher in matching
|
|
|
|
### Trust & Confidentiality Concerns
|
|
- **Challenge**: Companies reluctant to share sensitive operational data (costs, processes, quality specifications)
|
|
- **Solution**: Multi-tier data sharing (public/private/confidential), blockchain-based audit trails, GDPR-compliant data handling, trust scores based on verified transactions
|
|
- **Tactical**: Privacy tiers (public/network-only/private), device-signed validation for trusted data, anonymized discovery to reduce initial barriers
|
|
|
|
### Cold Start & Shallow Graph
|
|
- **Challenge**: With 20 companies, matches are rare; users conclude "nice idea, no value"
|
|
- **Solution**: Seed data from public registries, building footprints, NACE classifications, known utilities; mark as "unverified" but useful for initial matching
|
|
- **Tactical**: Start with "cheap-to-act" resources (low-temp heat, logistics consolidation, shared services, waste pickups) that don't require capital investment
|
|
|
|
### Data Acquisition Bottleneck
|
|
- **Challenge**: Fresh, structured, geo-anchored resource data is scarce; manual entry is slow, integrations expensive, public data insufficient
|
|
- **Solution**: Multi-channel data acquisition strategy combining forced adoption, partnerships, and incentives
|
|
- **Tactical**:
|
|
- **Force Function**: Bundle data entry with mandatory processes (CSRD reporting, energy audits, municipal permits, environmental licenses)
|
|
- **Partner Ingestion**: Utilities provide anonymized network data, industrial parks share facility data, consultants import during audits
|
|
- **Incentive Rewards**: More matches for complete profiles, lower fees for data contributors, priority access for data-rich facilities
|
|
- **Progressive Refinement**: Start with rough estimates, reward IoT/SCADA integration with premium features
|
|
- **Seed Data Strategy**: Import public registries, utility maps, building footprints, industry association data
|
|
|
|
### Misaligned Payoff
|
|
- **Challenge**: Matches often require capital expenditure (pipes, heat exchangers) that SMEs won't prioritize
|
|
- **Solution**: Focus on OPEX-shared deals first (waste pickup, maintenance, supplies); show immediate savings without capex
|
|
- **Tactical**: Include parametric cost calculators (pipe €/m, HX €/kW) and payback analysis to quantify investment requirements
|
|
|
|
### Network Effects & Critical Mass
|
|
- **Challenge**: Platforms fail without sufficient active participants creating a "chicken-and-egg" problem
|
|
- **Solution**: Seed data from public datasets, government partnerships, phased rollout (local→regional→national), incentives for early adopters
|
|
|
|
### Geographic & Logistical Constraints
|
|
- **Challenge**: Transportation costs and regulatory barriers limit viable synergies
|
|
- **Solution**: Multi-modal transport optimization, regulatory harmonization advocacy, regional clustering algorithms
|
|
|
|
### Technical Expertise Gap
|
|
- **Challenge**: Companies lack knowledge of potential synergies and valuation methods
|
|
- **Solution**: AI-powered recommender systems, educational resources, expert consultation marketplace, automated feasibility assessments
|
|
|
|
---
|