mirror of
https://github.com/SamyRai/turash.git
synced 2025-12-26 23:01:33 +00:00
- Complete platform specification and architecture - MVP concept and business model - Technical implementation plans and roadmaps - Financial projections and funding strategy - Brand identity and marketing materials - Mathematical models for resource matching - Competitive analysis and market research - Go-based core models and algorithms Turash guides businesses to optimal resource exchanges, navigating the complex landscape of industrial symbiosis and providing direction to sustainable profitability.
264 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
264 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
# Implementation Gap Report: Mathematical Model vs. Concept & Schemas
|
|
|
|
**Date:** November 1, 2025
|
|
**Status:** Comprehensive review completed
|
|
|
|
## Executive Summary
|
|
|
|
The current mathematical model provides excellent **overall business economics** but is missing critical **individual match economics** and **matching engine** components required by the platform concept and schemas. While we have comprehensive exchange cost calculations, we're missing the core platform functionality for matching businesses and calculating match-specific economics.
|
|
|
|
## Current Implementation Status
|
|
|
|
### ✅ **COMPLETED COMPONENTS**
|
|
|
|
#### 1. Exchange Cost Calculator (Transport Module)
|
|
- **Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
|
|
- **Coverage:** All 16 symbiosis types from concept
|
|
- **Features:**
|
|
- Capital/operating costs for all exchange types
|
|
- Complexity multipliers (1.0x/1.3x/1.8x)
|
|
- Risk mitigation costs (1-5% based on risk level)
|
|
- Regulatory compliance costs (0.05-3% by type)
|
|
- Feasibility scoring
|
|
- CLI integration (`models exchange`)
|
|
- Comprehensive test coverage
|
|
|
|
#### 2. Unit Economics Model
|
|
- **Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
|
|
- **Coverage:** LTV/CAC calculations with tier-specific analysis
|
|
- **Features:**
|
|
- Tier-specific LTV calculations (Basic/Business/Enterprise)
|
|
- Churn rate modeling
|
|
- Upsell revenue calculations
|
|
- Payback period analysis
|
|
- Blended LTV/CAC ratios
|
|
|
|
#### 3. Overall Business Profitability
|
|
- **Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
|
|
- **Coverage:** NPV/IRR/Payback for entire business model
|
|
- **Features:**
|
|
- 10-year NPV calculations
|
|
- IRR computation with Newton's method
|
|
- Payback period analysis
|
|
- Discount rate sensitivity
|
|
|
|
#### 4. Business Model Components
|
|
- **Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
|
|
- **Coverage:** Customer growth, revenue, costs, environmental impact
|
|
- **Features:**
|
|
- Multi-tier subscription revenue
|
|
- Transaction/marketplace revenue
|
|
- Municipal revenue streams
|
|
- Comprehensive cost structure
|
|
- CO2 reduction calculations
|
|
- Validation rules and sanity checks
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## ✅ **RECENTLY COMPLETED COMPONENTS**
|
|
|
|
### 1. **INDIVIDUAL MATCH ECONOMICS** - ✅ IMPLEMENTED
|
|
**Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED (November 1, 2025)
|
|
**Source:** `concept/schemas/economic_calculation.json`
|
|
**Location:** `models/match/` (300+ lines, 13 test cases)
|
|
**CLI:** `models match --source-id X --target-id Y --annual-qty N --unit-value V`
|
|
|
|
**Implemented Calculations:**
|
|
- ✅ **Annual savings** from individual matches (€)
|
|
- ✅ **Match-specific NPV/IRR/Payback** (10-year horizons with Newton's method)
|
|
- ✅ **Transportation costs** per match (integrated with exchange cost calculator)
|
|
- ✅ **CO2 reduction per match** (tonnes/year with configurable factors)
|
|
- ✅ **Implementation complexity** assessment (low/medium/high)
|
|
- ✅ **Regulatory requirements** tracking (waste permits, energy licenses, insurance)
|
|
|
|
**Example Output:**
|
|
```
|
|
Individual Match Economic Analysis
|
|
==================================
|
|
Match ID: match_waste_heat_001_process_heat_001
|
|
Economic Results:
|
|
Annual Savings: €560,000
|
|
Payback Period: 0.0 years
|
|
NPV (10 years): €3,831,287
|
|
IRR: 2127.8%
|
|
Transportation & Impact:
|
|
CO2 Reduction: 4.0 tonnes/year
|
|
Regulatory Requirements: [energy_distribution_license liability_insurance]
|
|
✅ Match appears economically viable
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## ✅ **RECENTLY COMPLETED COMPONENTS**
|
|
|
|
### 2. **GEOSPATIAL CALCULATIONS PACKAGE** - ✅ IMPLEMENTED
|
|
**Status:** ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED (January 2025)
|
|
**Location:** `bugulma/backend/internal/geospatial/` (11 files, 30+ test cases)
|
|
|
|
**Implemented Features:**
|
|
- ✅ **Haversine Distance**: Accurate great-circle distance calculations
|
|
- ✅ **Vincenty Distance**: Ellipsoidal distance calculations for high accuracy
|
|
- ✅ **Bearing Calculations**: Direction, midpoint, and destination point calculations
|
|
- ✅ **Bounding Box Operations**: Calculate, expand, area, point-in-box checks
|
|
- ✅ **Route Calculations**: Multi-point routes with segment details and time estimates
|
|
- ✅ **Distance Matrix**: Efficient all-pairs distance calculations
|
|
- ✅ **PostGIS Integration**: Query generation helpers for database spatial operations
|
|
- ✅ **Coordinate Transformations**: WGS84 ↔ Web Mercator conversions
|
|
- ✅ **Spatial Validation**: Comprehensive point and bounding box validation
|
|
- ✅ **Matching Service Integration**: Replaced placeholder distance calculations
|
|
|
|
**Impact**: Fixed critical bug where all distances were hardcoded to 10km. Matching service now uses accurate geographic calculations.
|
|
|
|
## ❌ **REMAINING MISSING COMPONENTS**
|
|
- **Maintenance cost factors** (5% of capital annually)
|
|
- **Energy cost inflation** modeling (2% annually)
|
|
|
|
**Data Structures Missing:**
|
|
```json
|
|
{
|
|
"match_id": "uuid",
|
|
"source_resource": "resource_flow",
|
|
"target_resource": "resource_flow",
|
|
"calculations": {
|
|
"annual_savings": 50000,
|
|
"payback_period_years": 2.1,
|
|
"npv_10_years": 150000,
|
|
"irr_percent": 25.0,
|
|
"transportation_costs": {
|
|
"annual_cost": 8400,
|
|
"distance_km": 2.0,
|
|
"method": "pipeline"
|
|
},
|
|
"co2_reduction_tonnes": 500,
|
|
"implementation_complexity": "medium",
|
|
"regulatory_requirements": ["waste_permit", "transport_license"]
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. **MATCHING ENGINE ALGORITHMS** - HIGH PRIORITY
|
|
**Source:** `concept/10_matching_engine_core_algorithm.md`
|
|
**Impact:** Platform cannot match businesses
|
|
|
|
**Missing Algorithms:**
|
|
- **Multi-stage matching pipeline:**
|
|
- Pre-filtering (resource type, geography, quality, regulatory)
|
|
- Compatibility assessment with weighted scoring
|
|
- Economic viability analysis per match
|
|
- **Compatibility scoring:**
|
|
```
|
|
score = w1*quality_compatibility + w2*temporal_overlap + w3*quantity_match
|
|
+ w4*trust_factors - w5*transport_cost_penalty - w6*regulatory_risk
|
|
```
|
|
- **Advanced optimization:**
|
|
- Max-flow/min-cost algorithms
|
|
- Clustering for symbiosis zones
|
|
- Multi-criteria decision support (AHP, fuzzy logic)
|
|
|
|
### 3. **MATCH LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT** - HIGH PRIORITY
|
|
**Source:** `concept/schemas/match.json`
|
|
**Impact:** No match state management
|
|
|
|
**Missing Features:**
|
|
- **Match states:** suggested → negotiating → reserved → contracted → live → failed/cancelled
|
|
- **Negotiation history** tracking
|
|
- **Contract details** management
|
|
- **Economic value** per match
|
|
- **Risk assessments** (technical/regulatory/market)
|
|
- **Transportation estimates** per match
|
|
- **Priority scoring** (1-10 scale)
|
|
|
|
### 4. **RESOURCE FLOW COMPATIBILITY** - MEDIUM PRIORITY
|
|
**Source:** `concept/schemas/resource_flow.json`
|
|
**Impact:** Cannot validate resource matches
|
|
|
|
**Missing Components:**
|
|
- **Quality compatibility** assessment (temperature, pressure, purity, grade)
|
|
- **Temporal overlap** analysis (availability schedules, seasonality)
|
|
- **Quantity matching** algorithms
|
|
- **Economic data** integration (cost_in, cost_out, waste_disposal_cost)
|
|
- **Constraint validation** (max_distance, permits, quality thresholds)
|
|
- **Service domain** matching (maintenance, consulting, transport)
|
|
|
|
### 5. **DATA QUALITY & TRUST METRICS** - MEDIUM PRIORITY
|
|
**Source:** Concept documents (data quality death spiral prevention)
|
|
**Impact:** No quality differentiation between businesses
|
|
|
|
**Missing Features:**
|
|
- **Profile completeness** scoring
|
|
- **Data source validation** (declared/device/calculated)
|
|
- **Device signature** verification
|
|
- **Precision level** assessment (rough/estimated/measured)
|
|
- **Trust factor** calculations
|
|
- **Historical transaction** success rates
|
|
|
|
### 6. **REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TRACKING** - MEDIUM PRIORITY
|
|
**Source:** Multiple schemas (resource_flow, match, economic_calculation)
|
|
**Impact:** Cannot assess regulatory feasibility
|
|
|
|
**Missing Features:**
|
|
- **Permit requirement** identification
|
|
- **Regulatory risk** assessment
|
|
- **Compliance status** tracking
|
|
- **Approval timeline** estimates
|
|
- **Cross-border** regulatory considerations
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🔧 **IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP**
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Core Matching Infrastructure (Week 1-2)
|
|
1. **Match Data Structures** - Implement match.json schema structures
|
|
2. **Resource Flow Models** - Basic resource flow compatibility
|
|
3. **Simple Compatibility Scoring** - Basic matching algorithm
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: Economic Match Calculations (Week 3-4)
|
|
1. **Individual Match Economics** - NPV/IRR/payback per match
|
|
2. **Transportation Cost Integration** - Link exchange costs to matches
|
|
3. **CO2 Impact per Match** - Match-specific environmental calculations
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Advanced Matching Engine (Week 5-6)
|
|
1. **Multi-Criteria Decision Support** - AHP, fuzzy logic integration
|
|
2. **Optimization Algorithms** - Max-flow, clustering
|
|
3. **Regulatory Compliance** - Permit and approval tracking
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Data Quality & Trust (Week 7-8)
|
|
1. **Profile Completeness Scoring**
|
|
2. **Trust Factor Calculations**
|
|
3. **Historical Performance Tracking**
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 📊 **IMPACT ASSESSMENT**
|
|
|
|
| Component | Current Status | Business Impact | Implementation Effort |
|
|
|-----------|----------------|----------------|----------------------|
|
|
| Exchange Cost Calculator | ✅ Complete | Medium | ✅ Done |
|
|
| Individual Match Economics | ✅ Complete | **HIGH** | ✅ Done |
|
|
| Advanced Economic Calculator | ✅ Complete | **HIGH** | ✅ Done |
|
|
| Geospatial Calculations | ✅ Complete | **HIGH** | ✅ Done |
|
|
| Matching Engine | ✅ Partial | **CRITICAL** | High |
|
|
| Match Lifecycle | ✅ Complete | **HIGH** | ✅ Done |
|
|
| Resource Compatibility | ✅ Partial | **HIGH** | Medium |
|
|
| Data Quality | ❌ Missing | Medium | Low |
|
|
|
|
**Key Progress:**
|
|
- ✅ Individual match economics implemented - platform can calculate economic viability of specific business-to-business matches
|
|
- ✅ Advanced economic calculator extensions completed - comprehensive financial analysis with sensitivity analysis, risk assessment, and CO2 breakdown
|
|
- ✅ Geospatial calculations package implemented - fixed critical bug where distances were hardcoded to 10km
|
|
- ✅ Matching engine core algorithms implemented with geographic filtering
|
|
|
|
**Key Finding:** The platform now has accurate geographic calculations, comprehensive economic analysis capabilities, and can match businesses based on real distances with full financial viability assessment. Next critical gaps: advanced optimization algorithms and data quality metrics.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## 🎯 **NEXT STEPS**
|
|
|
|
1. ✅ **COMPLETED:** Individual match economics implemented
|
|
2. **Immediate Priority:** Implement matching engine algorithms (compatibility scoring)
|
|
3. **Architecture Decision:** Create `matching` package for core algorithms
|
|
4. **Integration Point:** Link match economics to compatibility scoring
|
|
5. **Testing Strategy:** Integration tests for end-to-end matching scenarios
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
*This report identifies the critical gaps between the implemented mathematical model and the platform requirements specified in the concept and schemas.*
|