mirror of
https://github.com/SamyRai/turash.git
synced 2025-12-26 23:01:33 +00:00
Repository Structure:
- Move files from cluttered root directory into organized structure
- Create archive/ for archived data and scraper results
- Create bugulma/ for the complete application (frontend + backend)
- Create data/ for sample datasets and reference materials
- Create docs/ for comprehensive documentation structure
- Create scripts/ for utility scripts and API tools
Backend Implementation:
- Implement 3 missing backend endpoints identified in gap analysis:
* GET /api/v1/organizations/{id}/matching/direct - Direct symbiosis matches
* GET /api/v1/users/me/organizations - User organizations
* POST /api/v1/proposals/{id}/status - Update proposal status
- Add complete proposal domain model, repository, and service layers
- Create database migration for proposals table
- Fix CLI server command registration issue
API Documentation:
- Add comprehensive proposals.md API documentation
- Update README.md with Users and Proposals API sections
- Document all request/response formats, error codes, and business rules
Code Quality:
- Follow existing Go backend architecture patterns
- Add proper error handling and validation
- Match frontend expected response schemas
- Maintain clean separation of concerns (handler -> service -> repository)
578 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
578 lines
24 KiB
Markdown
## 28. Detailed Project Roadmap & Milestones
|
|
|
|
*For strategic prototype roadmap with high-level phases, see [24_prototype_roadmap.md](24_prototype_roadmap.md)*
|
|
|
|
### Executive Summary
|
|
18-month roadmap from concept to market validation with €2.5M seed funding. Focus on de-risking core assumptions while building scalable platform based on Go 1.25 stack, graph-based matching engine, and progressive value delivery through resource matching + service marketplace.
|
|
|
|
**Financial Projections (Revised)**: Initial projections were overly optimistic. Revised targets align with industry benchmarks for seed-stage B2B SaaS:
|
|
- **Month 6**: €8k-€12k MRR (vs. optimistic €25k)
|
|
- **Month 12**: €25k-€40k MRR (vs. optimistic €150k)
|
|
- **Month 18**: €50k-€80k MRR (€600k-€960k ARR) for Series A readiness
|
|
- **Conversion Rate**: 5-8% free-to-paid (industry average: 2-5%, exceptional: 10-15%)
|
|
- **Target**: Series A readiness (€3M+ ARR typically required) vs. IPO-readiness in original projections
|
|
|
|
### Phase 1: Foundation & MVP (Months 1-3) - €400k Budget
|
|
**Goal**: Validate core assumptions, build heat-matching MVP with manual entry
|
|
|
|
#### Month 1: Core Setup & Technical Foundation
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- Team assembly (8 engineers: 4 backend, 2 frontend, 1 DevOps, 1 data; 2 domain experts, 1 BD)
|
|
- Development environment setup (Docker Compose, local Neo4j/PostgreSQL)
|
|
- Infrastructure provisioning (AWS EKS/GCP GKE, managed Neo4j/PostgreSQL)
|
|
- Legal entity formation and seed documents
|
|
- **ADR Framework**: Architecture Decision Records setup and initial decisions
|
|
- **Go 1.25 Stack Setup**: Gin/Fiber selection, Neo4j driver, PostgreSQL/PostGIS with pgx
|
|
- **Open Standards Foundation**: NGSI-LD API integration (2-3 weeks) for smart city interoperability
|
|
- **Message Queue**: NATS or Redis Streams selection (not Kafka for MVP)
|
|
- **Security Foundation**: JWT, OAuth2, RBAC implementation
|
|
- Basic CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions)
|
|
|
|
**Technical Decisions (ADRs):**
|
|
- Graph database: Neo4j (migration path to TigerGraph if >10B nodes)
|
|
- HTTP framework: Gin (consider Fiber if low latency critical)
|
|
- Message queue (MVP): NATS or Redis Streams
|
|
- Go 1.25 experimental features: Build with feature flags, fallback to Go 1.23 if not production-ready
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- Team fully onboarded and productive
|
|
- All core infrastructure deployed
|
|
- Basic CI/CD pipeline operational
|
|
- Development environment documented and replicable
|
|
|
|
**Risks:** Team hiring delays, infrastructure complexity, Go 1.25 experimental feature availability
|
|
**Mitigation:** Pre-hire key technical roles, use managed services, feature flags for experimental features
|
|
|
|
#### Month 2: Data Architecture & Matching Engine Core
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Graph Database Setup**: Neo4j cluster with APOC library
|
|
- **Spatial Database Setup**: PostgreSQL + PostGIS for geospatial queries
|
|
- **Hybrid Architecture**: Neo4j (relationships) + PostGIS (spatial queries) synchronization
|
|
- **Data Ingestion Pipelines**: Manual entry API, CSV upload, basic validation
|
|
- **Seed Data Collection**: Berlin industrial park data (public registries, building footprints)
|
|
- **Matching Engine Prototype**:
|
|
- Spatial pre-filtering (PostGIS 5km radius)
|
|
- Quality matching (temperature compatibility)
|
|
- Temporal overlap calculation
|
|
- Economic scoring (basic cost-benefit)
|
|
- **Resource Plugin Architecture**: Heat exchange plugin (MVP resource type)
|
|
- **Caching Layer**: Redis for match results (15-minute TTL)
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 50 businesses with resource flow data (seed data + manual entry)
|
|
- Basic matching engine finds 10+ viable heat matches
|
|
- Data ingestion reliability >95%
|
|
- Matching query latency <2s (p95)
|
|
|
|
**Technical Milestones:**
|
|
- Graph database schemas deployed (Business, Site, ResourceFlow nodes)
|
|
- Spatial indexes created and tested
|
|
- Basic REST API endpoints functional
|
|
- Seed data quality validation completed
|
|
|
|
#### Month 3: MVP Core Features & Pilot Launch
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Heat Flow Matching**: Manual entry only, heat resource type focus
|
|
- **Map Visualization**: React + Mapbox GL, resource flows as colored dots, match connections
|
|
- **Business Registration**: Simple onboarding flow (15 minutes to complete)
|
|
- **Match Notification System**: Basic email notifications (WebSocket in Phase 2)
|
|
- **Service Marketplace Foundation**: Basic structure for future expansion
|
|
- **Privacy-First Design**: Public/network-only/private data tiers
|
|
- **Free Tier**: See + Match functionality (drive network effects)
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 20 businesses registered in pilot (Berlin industrial + hospitality)
|
|
- 15 heat matches identified and contacted
|
|
- 3 expressions of interest for implementation
|
|
- ≥60% data completion rate
|
|
- ≥5 actionable matches per business
|
|
|
|
**User Testing:**
|
|
- Pilot user feedback sessions (10-15 businesses)
|
|
- UI/UX validation with target users
|
|
- Feature prioritization based on user input
|
|
- Cold start problem validation
|
|
|
|
**Pilot Selection:**
|
|
- Vertical focus: "Heat reuse in Berlin industrial + hospitality sector"
|
|
- "Cheap-to-act" resources focus: Low-capex matches (shared services, waste pickup)
|
|
- Manual data seeding from public sources
|
|
|
|
### Phase 2: MVP Expansion & Revenue (Months 4-6) - €500k Budget
|
|
**Goal**: Expand to multi-resource, automated ingestion, service marketplace, initial revenue
|
|
|
|
#### Month 4: Multi-Resource Support & Service Marketplace
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Water Resource Plugin**: Wastewater reuse, water quality matching
|
|
- **Waste Resource Plugin**: Material exchange, by-product reuse
|
|
- **Economic Calculation Engine**:
|
|
- NPV, IRR, payback period calculations
|
|
- Sensitivity analysis
|
|
- Scenario modeling
|
|
- **Enhanced Matching Algorithms**:
|
|
- Multi-criteria scoring (quality, temporal, economic, distance, trust)
|
|
- Ranking engine with diversity consideration
|
|
- Fallback matching (relaxed constraints)
|
|
- **Service Marketplace MVP**:
|
|
- Maintenance services matching
|
|
- Shared service opportunities
|
|
- Group buying foundation
|
|
- **Privacy-Preserving Matching**: Anonymized discovery, network-only visibility
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 3 resource types fully supported (heat, water, waste)
|
|
- Economic calculations accurate to ±10%
|
|
- 50% increase in match quality
|
|
- Service marketplace: 5-10 service providers registered
|
|
|
|
**Technical Milestones:**
|
|
- Resource plugin architecture proven (3 plugins working)
|
|
- Economic calculator validated against manual calculations
|
|
- Matching algorithm performance maintained (<2s p95 latency)
|
|
|
|
#### Month 5: Automated Data Ingestion & Event-Driven Architecture
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Event-Driven Architecture**:
|
|
- NATS/Redis Streams for event processing
|
|
- Event handlers for ResourceFlow changes
|
|
- Incremental matching (only affected subgraphs)
|
|
- **ERP/SCADA API Integrations**:
|
|
- SAP, Oracle basic integration (REST API)
|
|
- OPC UA protocol support
|
|
- **IoT Device Connectivity**:
|
|
- Modbus RTU/TCP support
|
|
- MQTT broker integration
|
|
- OGC SensorThings API (Phase 2 priority from prototype roadmap)
|
|
- **Data Quality Validation Pipeline**:
|
|
- Precision levels (rough/estimated/measured)
|
|
- Device-signed validation
|
|
- Data quality scoring
|
|
- **Background Processing**: Go workers with channel-based processing
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 80% reduction in manual data entry (for early adopters with integrations)
|
|
- Data freshness <24 hours
|
|
- Ingestion success rate >98%
|
|
- Event processing latency <100ms (p95)
|
|
|
|
**Migration Strategy:**
|
|
- Document Kafka migration path (trigger: 1000+ businesses)
|
|
- Monitor NATS/Redis Streams performance
|
|
- Prepare migration plan for scale phase
|
|
|
|
#### Month 6: Revenue Generation & Performance Optimization
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Subscription Billing System**:
|
|
- Stripe integration
|
|
- Free/Basic/Business/Enterprise tiers
|
|
- Usage-based billing foundation
|
|
- **Lead Fee Collection**: Commission tracking for facilitated introductions
|
|
- **Basic Analytics Dashboard**:
|
|
- Business resource flow analytics
|
|
- Match success metrics
|
|
- Environmental impact (CO₂ savings)
|
|
- **Performance Optimization**:
|
|
- Query result caching (Redis)
|
|
- Graph query optimization (Cypher profiling)
|
|
- Materialized views for common match patterns
|
|
- **Go 1.25 Features Evaluation**:
|
|
- JSON v2 performance testing (if production-ready)
|
|
- GreenTea GC evaluation (if production-ready)
|
|
- Fallback to Go 1.23 stable features if needed
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 30-50 paying customers (free + paid tiers) - realistic for B2B industrial SaaS
|
|
- €8k-€12k monthly recurring revenue (MRR) - conservative estimate
|
|
- Platform performance: <2s response times (p95)
|
|
- Customer satisfaction >4/5 stars
|
|
- Cache hit rate >70%
|
|
- **Conversion Rate**: 5-8% free-to-paid (industry average: 2-5%, exceptional: 10-15%)
|
|
|
|
**Go-to-Market:**
|
|
- Launch in Berlin industrial ecosystem
|
|
- Partnership agreements with utilities (data + distribution)
|
|
- Initial marketing campaign (content marketing, LinkedIn)
|
|
- Municipal dashboard pilot (1-2 cities, free for businesses, paid for cities)
|
|
|
|
### Phase 3: Enterprise Features & Scale (Months 7-12) - €900k Budget
|
|
**Goal**: Enterprise readiness, knowledge graph integration, international expansion
|
|
|
|
#### Months 7-8: Advanced Platform Features & Knowledge Graph
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Real-Time WebSocket Notifications**:
|
|
- Match updates, new opportunities
|
|
- Live resource flow changes
|
|
- Go WebSocket server (gorilla/websocket or nhooyr.io/websocket)
|
|
- **Advanced Analytics and Reporting**:
|
|
- Predictive matching recommendations
|
|
- Scenario analysis tools
|
|
- ESG impact reporting (CSRD compliance)
|
|
- **API Ecosystem Foundation**:
|
|
- REST API v1 stable
|
|
- API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger)
|
|
- Webhook system for third-party integrations
|
|
- Rate limiting and API key management
|
|
- **Mobile PWA Launch**:
|
|
- Progressive Web App with offline support
|
|
- Push notifications
|
|
- Mobile-optimized map interface
|
|
- **Knowledge Graph Integration** (Phase 2 priority from architecture):
|
|
- Semantic matching enhancement
|
|
- Taxonomy integration (EWC, NACE codes)
|
|
- Process compatibility matrices
|
|
- Expected: 30-40% match quality improvement
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 150-200 active businesses (realistic growth from 30-50 paying to ~150 total)
|
|
- €25k-€40k monthly revenue (MRR) - conservative but achievable
|
|
- API adoption by 5-10 enterprises (early adopters)
|
|
- Mobile usage >20% of sessions
|
|
- Knowledge graph: 10-15% improvement in match quality (initial)
|
|
|
|
#### Months 9-10: Enterprise Integrations & Multi-Tenancy
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **GraphQL API Implementation**:
|
|
- gqlgen schema-first approach
|
|
- Flexible querying for enterprise clients
|
|
- Subscriptions for real-time updates
|
|
- **Advanced ERP Integrations**:
|
|
- SAP (RFC, OData)
|
|
- Oracle (REST, SOAP)
|
|
- Microsoft Dynamics
|
|
- Integration marketplace
|
|
- **Multi-Tenancy Architecture**:
|
|
- Data isolation (schema-per-tenant or row-level security)
|
|
- Tenant management dashboard
|
|
- Resource usage tracking per tenant
|
|
- **Advanced Security Features**:
|
|
- SOC2 compliance preparation
|
|
- Advanced audit logging
|
|
- Data encryption at rest and in transit
|
|
- RBAC enhancements
|
|
- **Message Queue Migration**:
|
|
- Evaluate Kafka migration if scale requires (>1000 businesses)
|
|
- NATS → Kafka migration plan execution if triggered
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 15-25 enterprise customers (realistic for enterprise sales cycle)
|
|
- €80k-€120k monthly revenue (MRR) - B2B enterprise SaaS typically slower to scale
|
|
- Integration success rate >95%
|
|
- SOC2 Type I compliance preparation (certification takes 6-12 months)
|
|
- Multi-tenant architecture validated
|
|
|
|
#### Months 11-12: International Expansion & Regional Features
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Multi-Language Support**:
|
|
- i18n framework (English, German, Dutch, Swedish)
|
|
- Localized UI and content
|
|
- Regional data formats
|
|
- **Regional Data Residency**:
|
|
- EU data residency options (GDPR compliance)
|
|
- Cross-border data transfer controls
|
|
- Data localization settings
|
|
- **International Utility Partnerships**:
|
|
- Netherlands (regional utilities)
|
|
- Nordics (district heating networks)
|
|
- Partnership revenue sharing model
|
|
- **Market Expansion**:
|
|
- Netherlands market entry
|
|
- Nordics pilot (Sweden, Denmark)
|
|
- Regional regulatory compliance (country-specific)
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 300-400 total businesses across 3 countries (realistic for international expansion)
|
|
- €150k-€200k monthly revenue (MRR) - conservative growth trajectory
|
|
- 100-150% YoY growth rate (more realistic for seed stage)
|
|
- 2-3 new market entries validated (Netherlands + 1-2 Nordics)
|
|
- Regional partnerships: 3-5 utility agreements (partnerships take time to develop)
|
|
|
|
### Phase 4: Scale & Optimization (Months 13-18) - €700k Budget
|
|
**Goal**: Full scale operations, AI-enhanced matching, profitability
|
|
|
|
#### Months 13-15: Advanced AI & Automation
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **ML-Powered Match Recommendations**:
|
|
- GraphRAG integration (Neo4j GraphRAG) for natural language queries
|
|
- Predictive matching (anticipate resource needs)
|
|
- Pattern recognition (recurring opportunities)
|
|
- **Automated Lead Qualification**:
|
|
- Match quality scoring automation
|
|
- Lead conversion probability prediction
|
|
- Automated prioritization
|
|
- **Predictive Analytics**:
|
|
- Resource availability forecasting
|
|
- Demand prediction
|
|
- Scenario analysis with Monte Carlo simulation
|
|
- **Advanced Matching Algorithms**:
|
|
- Multi-party matching (3+ businesses)
|
|
- Network optimization algorithms
|
|
- Agent-based modeling for network simulation
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 70% improvement in match quality (vs. baseline)
|
|
- Automated lead conversion rate >40%
|
|
- Customer lifetime value increased by 25%
|
|
- GraphRAG: Natural language query support operational
|
|
|
|
#### Months 16-18: Full Market Penetration & Platform Maturity
|
|
**Deliverables:**
|
|
- **Complete API Ecosystem**:
|
|
- GraphQL + REST API
|
|
- WebSocket real-time APIs
|
|
- White-label API access
|
|
- Third-party developer portal
|
|
- **White-Label Platform**:
|
|
- Customizable branding per tenant
|
|
- Co-branded municipal dashboards
|
|
- Utility partner white-label solutions
|
|
- **Advanced Analytics Platform**:
|
|
- Business intelligence dashboards
|
|
- Custom report builder
|
|
- Data export (GDPR compliant)
|
|
- API for analytics integration
|
|
- **Strategic Partnerships**:
|
|
- Municipal partnerships (10+ cities)
|
|
- Utility partnerships (5+ major utilities)
|
|
- Facilitator marketplace expansion (50+ facilitators)
|
|
- Technology partnerships (ERP vendors)
|
|
|
|
**Success Metrics:**
|
|
- 800-1,200 businesses registered (realistic for 18-month seed stage)
|
|
- €300k-€400k monthly revenue (MRR) - €3.6M-€4.8M ARR
|
|
- 75-80% gross margins (realistic after infrastructure costs)
|
|
- 5-8 strategic partnerships (partnerships develop slowly)
|
|
- Path to Series A validated (€3M+ ARR typically needed for Series A)
|
|
|
|
### Critical Path Dependencies
|
|
|
|
#### Technical Dependencies
|
|
1. **Data Quality** → Matching Accuracy → User Adoption
|
|
2. **Performance** → Scalability → Enterprise Adoption
|
|
3. **Security** → Trust → Large Customer Acquisition
|
|
4. **Graph Database Setup** → Matching Engine → MVP Launch
|
|
5. **Go 1.25 Stack** → Backend Performance → User Experience
|
|
6. **Knowledge Graph Integration** → Match Quality → Enterprise Value
|
|
7. **Event-Driven Architecture** → Real-Time Features → User Engagement
|
|
|
|
#### Business Dependencies
|
|
1. **Seed Data** → Initial Matches → User Validation
|
|
2. **Utility Partnerships** → Data Access → Market Reach
|
|
3. **First Customers** → Case Studies → Market Momentum
|
|
4. **Service Marketplace** → Regular Engagement → Network Effects
|
|
5. **Municipal Partnerships** → Free Business Access → Network Growth
|
|
|
|
### Risk Mitigation Milestones
|
|
|
|
#### Monthly Risk Reviews
|
|
- **Technical Risks**: Performance, security, scalability, Go 1.25 experimental feature availability
|
|
- **Market Risks**: Adoption, competition, regulation, cold start problem
|
|
- **Financial Risks**: Burn rate, revenue projections, CAC/LTV ratio
|
|
- **Data Risks**: Data quality, privacy compliance, GDPR adherence
|
|
|
|
#### Pivot Triggers (Revised with Realistic Targets)
|
|
- **Month 3**: <10 businesses registered → Pivot to different market or vertical
|
|
- **Month 6**: <€5k MRR (€60k ARR run rate) → Focus on enterprise sales, adjust pricing
|
|
- **Month 9**: <€15k MRR (€180k ARR run rate) → Restructure business model, evaluate partnerships
|
|
- **Month 12**: <€30k MRR (€360k ARR run rate) → Pivot to municipal/utility-focused model
|
|
- **Month 18**: <€50k MRR (€600k ARR run rate) → Consider seed extension or pivot strategy
|
|
|
|
#### Early Warning Signals
|
|
- **Week 4**: <20 businesses signed up for pilot → Accelerate seed data collection
|
|
- **Month 4**: <40% data completion rate → Simplify onboarding, add support
|
|
- **Month 6**: No implemented connections → Focus on low-capex matches
|
|
- **Month 6**: Conversion rate <3% (free-to-paid) → Improve value proposition, pricing
|
|
- **Month 8**: CAC > 3x monthly revenue per customer → Reduce marketing spend, improve conversion
|
|
- **Month 9**: Churn rate >10% monthly → Address product-market fit issues
|
|
|
|
### Resource Allocation
|
|
|
|
#### Engineering Team (60% of budget)
|
|
- **Backend Engineers (4)**:
|
|
- Go 1.25 APIs, matching engine, graph database
|
|
- Event-driven architecture, message queue integration
|
|
- Economic calculator, plugin architecture
|
|
- **Frontend Engineers (2)**:
|
|
- React + Next.js, Mapbox visualization
|
|
- PWA development, real-time WebSocket UI
|
|
- **DevOps Engineer (1)**:
|
|
- Kubernetes infrastructure, CI/CD pipelines
|
|
- Monitoring (Prometheus, Grafana), infrastructure automation
|
|
- **Data Engineer (1)**:
|
|
- Data pipelines, ETL, analytics
|
|
- Knowledge graph integration, ML model deployment
|
|
|
|
#### Business Team (20% of budget)
|
|
- **Business Development (1 person)**:
|
|
- Utility partnerships, municipal sales
|
|
- Channel partner development
|
|
- **Domain Experts (2 people)**:
|
|
- Industrial symbiosis facilitation
|
|
- Regulatory compliance (EU, country-specific)
|
|
- **Operations/Customer Success (1 person)**:
|
|
- Customer onboarding, support
|
|
- Facilitator marketplace management
|
|
|
|
#### Infrastructure & Tools (20% of budget)
|
|
**Note**: Infrastructure costs scale with usage. Below are peak estimates for Month 18.
|
|
|
|
**Cloud Costs** (scaling from Month 1 to Month 18):
|
|
- **Month 1-6**: €2k-€5k/month (development, MVP scale: 50-100 businesses)
|
|
- AWS/GCP: €1.5k-€3k/month (EKS/GKE, managed databases small instances)
|
|
- Neo4j: €500-€1k/month (Community or small Enterprise)
|
|
- PostgreSQL RDS: €300-€500/month (small instances)
|
|
- Redis: €200-€400/month (small cache)
|
|
- **Month 7-12**: €5k-€10k/month (growth phase: 200-400 businesses)
|
|
- AWS/GCP: €3k-€6k/month
|
|
- Neo4j: €1k-€2k/month
|
|
- PostgreSQL RDS: €500-€1k/month
|
|
- Redis: €400-€800/month
|
|
- **Month 13-18**: €10k-€15k/month (scale phase: 800-1,200 businesses)
|
|
- AWS/GCP: €6k-€9k/month
|
|
- Neo4j: €2k-€3k/month (Enterprise scaling)
|
|
- PostgreSQL RDS: €1k-€2k/month
|
|
- Redis: €800-€1.5k/month
|
|
|
|
**Third-party Services**:
|
|
- **Monitoring** (Datadog/New Relic): €500-€2k/month (scales with infrastructure)
|
|
- **Security** (Vault, secrets management): €200-€500/month
|
|
- **Payments** (Stripe): Transaction-based (typically 2.9% + €0.30 per transaction)
|
|
- **Mapbox**: €0 (free tier: 50k loads/month), then €200-€500/month at scale
|
|
|
|
**Development Tools**:
|
|
- **GitHub Enterprise**: €4/user/month (or GitHub Pro at €4/user/month)
|
|
- **IDEs**: €100-€200/month (JetBrains licenses, etc.)
|
|
- **CI/CD**: Included in GitHub or €50-€200/month (CircleCI, etc.)
|
|
- **Artifact Repositories**: €50-€100/month
|
|
|
|
**Total Infrastructure Costs** (18 months):
|
|
- **Conservative Estimate**: €120k-€180k (assumes gradual scaling)
|
|
- **Realistic Peak**: €180k-€270k (if growth exceeds expectations)
|
|
|
|
### Success Metrics Dashboard
|
|
|
|
#### Daily Metrics
|
|
- Active users, API calls, error rates
|
|
- Match generation, user engagement
|
|
- Revenue, customer acquisition
|
|
|
|
#### Weekly Metrics
|
|
- Customer satisfaction, feature usage
|
|
- Performance benchmarks, uptime
|
|
- Market feedback, competitor analysis
|
|
|
|
#### Monthly Metrics
|
|
- Revenue growth, customer retention
|
|
- Market expansion, partnership progress
|
|
- Technical debt, code quality
|
|
- Team productivity, burn rate
|
|
|
|
### Exit Strategy Milestones
|
|
|
|
#### Year 1: Product-Market Fit (Realistic Targets)
|
|
- **50-100 paying customers** (conservative but achievable for B2B industrial SaaS)
|
|
- **€300k-€600k total revenue** (€250k-€500k ARR) - realistic for seed stage first year
|
|
- Clear unit economics (LTV/CAC ratio >3-5x target, 70x would be exceptional)
|
|
- Validated market demand and willingness to pay
|
|
- 3-5 implemented connections proving ROI
|
|
- Service marketplace operational (basic version)
|
|
|
|
**Note**: Most seed-stage B2B SaaS companies take 12-18 months to reach €500k ARR. €2M ARR in Year 1 would be exceptional (top 5% of startups).
|
|
|
|
#### Year 2: Scale Validation (If Product-Market Fit Achieved)
|
|
- **200-400 customers** (growth from proven model)
|
|
- **€1.5M-€3M total revenue** (€1.2M-€2.5M ARR) - 4-5x growth if PMF achieved
|
|
- International presence (2-3 countries)
|
|
- Operational excellence and repeatable processes
|
|
- 5-8 utility partnerships (realistic timeline)
|
|
- Knowledge graph showing measurable match quality improvement
|
|
|
|
#### Year 3: Exit Preparation (If Scale Validated)
|
|
- **600-1,000 customers** (realistic growth trajectory)
|
|
- **€4M-€6M total revenue** (€3.5M-€5M ARR) - Series A territory
|
|
- 75-80% gross margins, approaching profitability
|
|
- Strategic partnerships (utilities, municipalities, ERP vendors)
|
|
- Competitive moat established (network effects, data accumulation)
|
|
- Ready for Series A fundraising (€3M+ ARR typically minimum)
|
|
|
|
### Contingency Plans
|
|
|
|
#### Technical Failure Scenarios
|
|
- **Database Performance**: Fallback to simplified matching
|
|
- **API Downtime**: Cached responses, maintenance pages
|
|
- **Data Loss**: Comprehensive backups, recovery procedures
|
|
|
|
#### Business Failure Scenarios
|
|
- **Low Adoption**: Pivot to enterprise-focused model
|
|
- **Competition**: Differentiate through partnerships
|
|
- **Regulatory Changes**: Adapt compliance requirements
|
|
|
|
#### Financial Failure Scenarios
|
|
- **Slow Revenue**: Extend runway through strategic partnerships
|
|
- **High Burn Rate**: Reduce scope, focus on core features
|
|
- **Funding Delay**: Bootstrap through early revenue
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
### Implementation Timeline Visualization
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Month 1-3: Foundation & MVP
|
|
├── Team & Infra Setup (Go 1.25, Neo4j, NATS/Redis)
|
|
├── Data Architecture (Graph + Spatial)
|
|
├── Heat Matching MVP (manual entry)
|
|
└── Pilot Launch (Berlin industrial + hospitality)
|
|
|
|
Month 4-6: Expansion & Revenue
|
|
├── Multi-Resource Support (water, waste)
|
|
├── Service Marketplace MVP
|
|
├── Automated Ingestion (ERP, IoT)
|
|
└── Revenue Generation (subscriptions, leads)
|
|
|
|
Month 7-12: Enterprise & Scale
|
|
├── Knowledge Graph Integration
|
|
├── Advanced Features (WebSocket, analytics)
|
|
├── Enterprise Integrations (GraphQL, ERP)
|
|
├── Message Queue Migration (Kafka if needed)
|
|
└── International Expansion (Netherlands, Nordics)
|
|
|
|
Month 13-18: AI & Market Penetration
|
|
├── ML/AI Features (GraphRAG, predictive)
|
|
├── White-Label Platform
|
|
└── Strategic Partnerships
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Technology Evolution Timeline
|
|
|
|
#### MVP Phase (Months 1-6)
|
|
- **Message Queue**: NATS or Redis Streams
|
|
- **Go Version**: 1.25 with feature flags (fallback to 1.23)
|
|
- **Graph DB**: Neo4j Community/Enterprise
|
|
- **Deployment**: Kubernetes (EKS/GKE)
|
|
|
|
#### Scale Phase (Months 7-12)
|
|
- **Message Queue**: Evaluate Kafka migration (trigger: 1000+ businesses)
|
|
- **Go Version**: 1.25 stable features, evaluate experimental (JSON v2, GreenTea GC)
|
|
- **Graph DB**: Neo4j Enterprise (scaling), consider TigerGraph evaluation
|
|
- **Knowledge Graph**: Phase 2 implementation
|
|
|
|
#### Enterprise Phase (Months 13-18)
|
|
- **Message Queue**: Kafka if scale requires
|
|
- **Go Version**: Latest stable with production-ready experimental features
|
|
- **Graph DB**: Neo4j Enterprise or TigerGraph at scale
|
|
- **AI/ML**: GraphRAG, predictive analytics operational
|
|
|
|
**Total Timeline**: 18 months to product-market fit validation
|
|
**Total Budget**: €2.5M seed funding
|
|
**Success Criteria (Revised - Realistic)**:
|
|
- **800-1,200 businesses** registered (vs. optimistic 5,000)
|
|
- **€3.6M-€4.8M ARR** (€300k-€400k MRR) vs. optimistic €21M ARR
|
|
- **75-80% gross margins** (vs. optimistic 82%)
|
|
- **Series A readiness** (€3M+ ARR typically required) vs. IPO-readiness
|
|
|
|
**Realistic Growth Path**:
|
|
- Month 6: €8k-€12k MRR (€100k-€150k ARR run rate)
|
|
- Month 12: €25k-€40k MRR (€300k-€480k ARR run rate)
|
|
- Month 18: €50k-€80k MRR (€600k-€960k ARR run rate)
|
|
|
|
**Note**: The original projections (€21M ARR Year 3, 5,000 customers) would place Turash in the top 1% of B2B SaaS startups. The revised projections are more realistic for seed-stage companies while still being ambitious. Exceptional performance could exceed these targets.
|