mirror of
https://github.com/SamyRai/turash.git
synced 2025-12-26 23:01:33 +00:00
Repository Structure:
- Move files from cluttered root directory into organized structure
- Create archive/ for archived data and scraper results
- Create bugulma/ for the complete application (frontend + backend)
- Create data/ for sample datasets and reference materials
- Create docs/ for comprehensive documentation structure
- Create scripts/ for utility scripts and API tools
Backend Implementation:
- Implement 3 missing backend endpoints identified in gap analysis:
* GET /api/v1/organizations/{id}/matching/direct - Direct symbiosis matches
* GET /api/v1/users/me/organizations - User organizations
* POST /api/v1/proposals/{id}/status - Update proposal status
- Add complete proposal domain model, repository, and service layers
- Create database migration for proposals table
- Fix CLI server command registration issue
API Documentation:
- Add comprehensive proposals.md API documentation
- Update README.md with Users and Proposals API sections
- Document all request/response formats, error codes, and business rules
Code Quality:
- Follow existing Go backend architecture patterns
- Add proper error handling and validation
- Match frontend expected response schemas
- Maintain clean separation of concerns (handler -> service -> repository)
3.4 KiB
3.4 KiB
Turash Monetization Strategy
Overview
Turash employs a multi-stream monetization strategy combining subscription revenue (75-80%), transaction fees (10-15%), and municipal/government licenses (5-10%) to create a sustainable business model adapted to industrial symbiosis realities. The platform leverages network effects through a freemium tier (70% of users) that drives organic growth, converting 5-8% to paid subscriptions within 6-12 months.
Key Principles
- Value-Based Pricing: Tier pricing reflects value delivered (€5k-50k annual savings per facility)
- Network Effects Monetization: Free tier drives adoption, paid tiers monetize value
- Revenue Diversification: Multiple streams reduce dependency and increase predictability
- Outcome Alignment: Transaction fees align platform incentives with customer success
- Geographic Expansion: Municipal licenses enable scaling while reducing customer acquisition costs
Revenue Mix (Year 3 Target)
- Subscription Revenue: 75-80% (€3.5-4.2M)
- Transaction Revenue: 10-15% (€500k-750k)
- Municipal Revenue: 5-10% (€250k-500k)
- Total Revenue: €4-7M (base case)
Documentation Structure
Core Strategy
- Product Offerings - Core deliverables, value propositions, and product features
- Pricing Strategy - Tier structure, value-based pricing, and pricing rationale
- Revenue Model - Subscription tiers, transaction fees, and municipal licenses
Business Operations
- Financial Projections - Unit economics, LTV/CAC analysis, and profitability timeline
- Customer Acquisition - Acquisition channels, CAC optimization, and growth strategies
- Customer Retention - Engagement drivers, success enablement, and churn prevention
Market Strategy
- Go-to-Market Strategy - Vertical focus, bundling strategy, and channel partnerships
- Competitive Analysis - Competitor pricing and market positioning
- Risk Mitigation - Revenue, market, and operational risk management
Implementation
- Implementation Roadmap - Year 1-3 development and scaling phases
- Success Metrics - KPIs, revenue targets, and performance indicators
Strategic Context
This monetization strategy reflects industrial Europe 2025 realities: longer sales cycles, grant-dependent municipal adoption, and zone-based value creation. The base case (€4-7M Year 3) is achievable through utility partnerships and EU program alignment, with upside potential through major municipal wins.
Key Success Factors
- Utility Channel Strategy: 20-30% revenue share reduces CAC to €500-800
- Zone-Based Pricing: €500-1,000/year per industrial zone/cluster
- Grant-Mode SKU: "Turash for Funded Pilots" (€50k-100k) for EU programs
- Municipal Patience: 9-18 month sales cycles with grant co-funding
- ESG as Retention: Compliance features as retention tools (+15-20% ARPA uplift)
Financial Summary
- LTV/CAC Ratio: 3-5:1 (industrial segment reality)
- Payback Period: 15 months (blended across tiers)
- Year 3 Profitability: €2M profit (38% gross margin)
- Break-even: Year 4 with established scale