Repository Structure:
- Move files from cluttered root directory into organized structure
- Create archive/ for archived data and scraper results
- Create bugulma/ for the complete application (frontend + backend)
- Create data/ for sample datasets and reference materials
- Create docs/ for comprehensive documentation structure
- Create scripts/ for utility scripts and API tools
Backend Implementation:
- Implement 3 missing backend endpoints identified in gap analysis:
* GET /api/v1/organizations/{id}/matching/direct - Direct symbiosis matches
* GET /api/v1/users/me/organizations - User organizations
* POST /api/v1/proposals/{id}/status - Update proposal status
- Add complete proposal domain model, repository, and service layers
- Create database migration for proposals table
- Fix CLI server command registration issue
API Documentation:
- Add comprehensive proposals.md API documentation
- Update README.md with Users and Proposals API sections
- Document all request/response formats, error codes, and business rules
Code Quality:
- Follow existing Go backend architecture patterns
- Add proper error handling and validation
- Match frontend expected response schemas
- Maintain clean separation of concerns (handler -> service -> repository)
10 KiB
Implementation Gap Report: Mathematical Model vs. Concept & Schemas
Date: November 1, 2025 Status: Comprehensive review completed
Executive Summary
The current mathematical model provides excellent overall business economics but is missing critical individual match economics and matching engine components required by the platform concept and schemas. While we have comprehensive exchange cost calculations, we're missing the core platform functionality for matching businesses and calculating match-specific economics.
Current Implementation Status
✅ COMPLETED COMPONENTS
1. Exchange Cost Calculator (Transport Module)
- Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
- Coverage: All 16 symbiosis types from concept
- Features:
- Capital/operating costs for all exchange types
- Complexity multipliers (1.0x/1.3x/1.8x)
- Risk mitigation costs (1-5% based on risk level)
- Regulatory compliance costs (0.05-3% by type)
- Feasibility scoring
- CLI integration (
models exchange) - Comprehensive test coverage
2. Unit Economics Model
- Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
- Coverage: LTV/CAC calculations with tier-specific analysis
- Features:
- Tier-specific LTV calculations (Basic/Business/Enterprise)
- Churn rate modeling
- Upsell revenue calculations
- Payback period analysis
- Blended LTV/CAC ratios
3. Overall Business Profitability
- Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
- Coverage: NPV/IRR/Payback for entire business model
- Features:
- 10-year NPV calculations
- IRR computation with Newton's method
- Payback period analysis
- Discount rate sensitivity
4. Business Model Components
- Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED
- Coverage: Customer growth, revenue, costs, environmental impact
- Features:
- Multi-tier subscription revenue
- Transaction/marketplace revenue
- Municipal revenue streams
- Comprehensive cost structure
- CO2 reduction calculations
- Validation rules and sanity checks
✅ RECENTLY COMPLETED COMPONENTS
1. INDIVIDUAL MATCH ECONOMICS - ✅ IMPLEMENTED
Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED (November 1, 2025)
Source: concept/schemas/economic_calculation.json
Location: models/match/ (300+ lines, 13 test cases)
CLI: models match --source-id X --target-id Y --annual-qty N --unit-value V
Implemented Calculations:
- ✅ Annual savings from individual matches (€)
- ✅ Match-specific NPV/IRR/Payback (10-year horizons with Newton's method)
- ✅ Transportation costs per match (integrated with exchange cost calculator)
- ✅ CO2 reduction per match (tonnes/year with configurable factors)
- ✅ Implementation complexity assessment (low/medium/high)
- ✅ Regulatory requirements tracking (waste permits, energy licenses, insurance)
Example Output:
Individual Match Economic Analysis
==================================
Match ID: match_waste_heat_001_process_heat_001
Economic Results:
Annual Savings: €560,000
Payback Period: 0.0 years
NPV (10 years): €3,831,287
IRR: 2127.8%
Transportation & Impact:
CO2 Reduction: 4.0 tonnes/year
Regulatory Requirements: [energy_distribution_license liability_insurance]
✅ Match appears economically viable
✅ RECENTLY COMPLETED COMPONENTS
2. GEOSPATIAL CALCULATIONS PACKAGE - ✅ IMPLEMENTED
Status: ✅ FULLY IMPLEMENTED (January 2025)
Location: bugulma/backend/internal/geospatial/ (11 files, 30+ test cases)
Implemented Features:
- ✅ Haversine Distance: Accurate great-circle distance calculations
- ✅ Vincenty Distance: Ellipsoidal distance calculations for high accuracy
- ✅ Bearing Calculations: Direction, midpoint, and destination point calculations
- ✅ Bounding Box Operations: Calculate, expand, area, point-in-box checks
- ✅ Route Calculations: Multi-point routes with segment details and time estimates
- ✅ Distance Matrix: Efficient all-pairs distance calculations
- ✅ PostGIS Integration: Query generation helpers for database spatial operations
- ✅ Coordinate Transformations: WGS84 ↔ Web Mercator conversions
- ✅ Spatial Validation: Comprehensive point and bounding box validation
- ✅ Matching Service Integration: Replaced placeholder distance calculations
Impact: Fixed critical bug where all distances were hardcoded to 10km. Matching service now uses accurate geographic calculations.
❌ REMAINING MISSING COMPONENTS
- Maintenance cost factors (5% of capital annually)
- Energy cost inflation modeling (2% annually)
Data Structures Missing:
{
"match_id": "uuid",
"source_resource": "resource_flow",
"target_resource": "resource_flow",
"calculations": {
"annual_savings": 50000,
"payback_period_years": 2.1,
"npv_10_years": 150000,
"irr_percent": 25.0,
"transportation_costs": {
"annual_cost": 8400,
"distance_km": 2.0,
"method": "pipeline"
},
"co2_reduction_tonnes": 500,
"implementation_complexity": "medium",
"regulatory_requirements": ["waste_permit", "transport_license"]
}
}
2. MATCHING ENGINE ALGORITHMS - HIGH PRIORITY
Source: concept/10_matching_engine_core_algorithm.md
Impact: Platform cannot match businesses
Missing Algorithms:
- Multi-stage matching pipeline:
- Pre-filtering (resource type, geography, quality, regulatory)
- Compatibility assessment with weighted scoring
- Economic viability analysis per match
- Compatibility scoring:
score = w1*quality_compatibility + w2*temporal_overlap + w3*quantity_match + w4*trust_factors - w5*transport_cost_penalty - w6*regulatory_risk - Advanced optimization:
- Max-flow/min-cost algorithms
- Clustering for symbiosis zones
- Multi-criteria decision support (AHP, fuzzy logic)
3. MATCH LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT - HIGH PRIORITY
Source: concept/schemas/match.json
Impact: No match state management
Missing Features:
- Match states: suggested → negotiating → reserved → contracted → live → failed/cancelled
- Negotiation history tracking
- Contract details management
- Economic value per match
- Risk assessments (technical/regulatory/market)
- Transportation estimates per match
- Priority scoring (1-10 scale)
4. RESOURCE FLOW COMPATIBILITY - MEDIUM PRIORITY
Source: concept/schemas/resource_flow.json
Impact: Cannot validate resource matches
Missing Components:
- Quality compatibility assessment (temperature, pressure, purity, grade)
- Temporal overlap analysis (availability schedules, seasonality)
- Quantity matching algorithms
- Economic data integration (cost_in, cost_out, waste_disposal_cost)
- Constraint validation (max_distance, permits, quality thresholds)
- Service domain matching (maintenance, consulting, transport)
5. DATA QUALITY & TRUST METRICS - MEDIUM PRIORITY
Source: Concept documents (data quality death spiral prevention) Impact: No quality differentiation between businesses
Missing Features:
- Profile completeness scoring
- Data source validation (declared/device/calculated)
- Device signature verification
- Precision level assessment (rough/estimated/measured)
- Trust factor calculations
- Historical transaction success rates
6. REGULATORY COMPLIANCE TRACKING - MEDIUM PRIORITY
Source: Multiple schemas (resource_flow, match, economic_calculation) Impact: Cannot assess regulatory feasibility
Missing Features:
- Permit requirement identification
- Regulatory risk assessment
- Compliance status tracking
- Approval timeline estimates
- Cross-border regulatory considerations
🔧 IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP
Phase 1: Core Matching Infrastructure (Week 1-2)
- Match Data Structures - Implement match.json schema structures
- Resource Flow Models - Basic resource flow compatibility
- Simple Compatibility Scoring - Basic matching algorithm
Phase 2: Economic Match Calculations (Week 3-4)
- Individual Match Economics - NPV/IRR/payback per match
- Transportation Cost Integration - Link exchange costs to matches
- CO2 Impact per Match - Match-specific environmental calculations
Phase 3: Advanced Matching Engine (Week 5-6)
- Multi-Criteria Decision Support - AHP, fuzzy logic integration
- Optimization Algorithms - Max-flow, clustering
- Regulatory Compliance - Permit and approval tracking
Phase 4: Data Quality & Trust (Week 7-8)
- Profile Completeness Scoring
- Trust Factor Calculations
- Historical Performance Tracking
📊 IMPACT ASSESSMENT
| Component | Current Status | Business Impact | Implementation Effort |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exchange Cost Calculator | ✅ Complete | Medium | ✅ Done |
| Individual Match Economics | ✅ Complete | HIGH | ✅ Done |
| Advanced Economic Calculator | ✅ Complete | HIGH | ✅ Done |
| Geospatial Calculations | ✅ Complete | HIGH | ✅ Done |
| Matching Engine | ✅ Partial | CRITICAL | High |
| Match Lifecycle | ✅ Complete | HIGH | ✅ Done |
| Resource Compatibility | ✅ Partial | HIGH | Medium |
| Data Quality | ❌ Missing | Medium | Low |
Key Progress:
- ✅ Individual match economics implemented - platform can calculate economic viability of specific business-to-business matches
- ✅ Advanced economic calculator extensions completed - comprehensive financial analysis with sensitivity analysis, risk assessment, and CO2 breakdown
- ✅ Geospatial calculations package implemented - fixed critical bug where distances were hardcoded to 10km
- ✅ Matching engine core algorithms implemented with geographic filtering
Key Finding: The platform now has accurate geographic calculations, comprehensive economic analysis capabilities, and can match businesses based on real distances with full financial viability assessment. Next critical gaps: advanced optimization algorithms and data quality metrics.
🎯 NEXT STEPS
- ✅ COMPLETED: Individual match economics implemented
- Immediate Priority: Implement matching engine algorithms (compatibility scoring)
- Architecture Decision: Create
matchingpackage for core algorithms - Integration Point: Link match economics to compatibility scoring
- Testing Strategy: Integration tests for end-to-end matching scenarios
This report identifies the critical gaps between the implemented mathematical model and the platform requirements specified in the concept and schemas.